biligualism essays

biligualism essays I was born and raised in Taiwan, therefore I think my first language should be considered as mandarin. My problem to define myself is that because even though I was living in a mandarin dominated community, I start studying in a total English environment starting at kindergarten. (I was in an international school that only teaches English and no other languages). The family that I grew up is a bit complicated to explain also. My father and mother speaks to me in mandarin, my grandparent speaks to me in Taiwanese while my grandparent on my mothers side that I dont meet often speaks to me in Japanese. This situation has started ever since I could remember. So, I could consider that I am expose to three language, mandarin, English, and Taiwanese all together, plus a little Japanese. (Though I could hardly speak them) but I think I might consider myself as a balanced bilingual of English and Mandarin, because I could speak and listen this two language fluently and express myself without problem at all. Or, maybe some semibilingual also, because I have to think of what Im trying to express before I could blurt out fluently. Japanese Well I could only express in simple words. Even so, there is a big problem that I find as I browse through the book, the mother tongue. Which one should be my first language? Because its just abit to complicated for me to decide. But since I speak with my parent mostly in mandarin, then it should be considered mandarin. Also, most of the time when I was talking to my friends when they understands both mandarin and English, we often end up communicating with mixed languages. Ex. A sentence that contains a few words of mandarin and the rest English; which sounds a little funny but were just too used to it. Personally I think Im pretty lucking to grow up in this kind of environment because I grow up learning English and mandarin so easily, there isnt really a ha...

Death penalty misc13 essays

Death penalty misc13 essays Many people will argue that capital punishment is inappropriate as a proper means of punishment for murder and rape. The truth is the death penalty is the most effective form of retributive justice for those crimes. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for violent crime because executions maximize public safety through a form of incapacitation and deterrence. The death penalty has been around since the days of Moses and it is still around today. The reason for this is simply because it works. The Jews believe that the death penalty was God-given and therefore a necessary part of their religious and judicial system. The Jews use the death penalty to punish such grotesque offenses as bestiality and incest to somewhat minute charges of striking, cursing, or mere disobedience to one's parents. The methods the Jewish people use to inflict capital punishment are as varied as the crimes for which it is used: Stoning, burning, hanging, beheading, and several more less popular methods. If we look at the Roman Empire we see that crucifixion was a popular mode of execution because, not only did it get rid of the problem, it also punished the criminal with a great deal of torture. Crucifixion is probably the most cruel way to execute someone and therefore one of the most effective ways to deter crime. Crucifixion involved hanging a person to a device called a cross. The person first had to carry his cross through his hometown and to the place of his death. This further helped to deter crime since few people want their family and friends to witness such a humiliating experience. The criminal was then tied or nailed to the cross with his knees bent. The cross was then lifted up and set into a hole in the ground. This force would dislocate every joint in the body of the criminal. While the criminal hanged there, he could push himself up on a foot pedestal so that he could breathe. Eventually the man grew tired, s...

Current Event #3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Current Event #3 - Essay Example hey are depicted to be seeking protection for their psyches, given they are subjected to frustration due inability to achieve their personal objectives. In this case, this notion has led to association of bureaucracy with the negative perception concerning the phenomenon of bureau pathology is justified. For example, bureaucrats are not willing to listen to ideas from other employees; instead, they make decisions that may end up affecting the organization and the entire organization takes the blame. Another example is a case involving a person presents matters to be addressed by the administration; he or she has to wait for a long process that may end up discouraging them. 2) Discuss to what extent "red tape" is a natural and intended characteristic of bureaucratic organizations and whether the fault lies with the laws, the system, the organizations executives or the employees. Use at least two examples or personal observation to justify your response. Red tape is term frequently invoked to represent organizational operations that are perceived to be wasteful and redundant, self-serving and inconvenient; in fact, it is considered the worst connotation of bureaucrats (Bozeman, 245). Red tape is considered to intend attribute of bureaucratic organization and this caused by the system in the organization; the system in bureaucratic organizations may have some regulations that require employees and executives to follow certain procedures that are not necessary; thus, this may led to wastage of resources but they are not to blame (Bozeman, 245). For example, there are organizations that do not have delegation of any decisions, even the simplest once that require application of logic by employees; in that case, this leads to waste of time in decision-making. Another example where a manager is expected to make decision and this has to be subjected to a long chain of officials leading to wastage of time and